AC9S9I07
Evaluating
construct arguments based on analysis of a variety of evidence to support conclusions or evaluate claims, and consider any ethical issues and cultural protocols associated with accessing, using or citing secondary data or information
Elaborations
- AC9S9I07_E1examining secondary data to determine the credibility of the source and the validity and reproducibility of the data
- AC9S9I07_E2identifying multiple sources of evidence that are consistent with a claim such as the effectiveness of a vaccine
- AC9S9I07_E3interrogating the evidence and reasoning used to justify claims regarding the age of ancient artefacts
- AC9S9I07_E4researching the methods used by scientists in studies reported in the media to evaluate the validity of the headlines
- AC9S9I07_E5examining secondary data to ensure it does not contain personal information which could potentially harm individuals, is correctly cited and is relevant to the investigation question or claim
- AC9S9I07_E6acknowledging and identifying the relationship between First Peoples’ knowledges and contemporary science and the co-contributions in arriving at shared understandings when working ‘both ways’
- AC9S9I07_E7acknowledging and constructing an argument for the contributions to medicine of First Nations Australians’ knowledges of physiological pathways and contemporary medicinal delivery systems
Loading...